Back to Language as Infrastructure
working paper2026Companion manuscript

Dead Circuits: Activation Profiling and Script Invisibility in Large Language Models

This companion paper profiles activation behavior when a model is asked to process N'Ko. The thesis is that some scripts do not merely perform poorly at the output layer; they fail to activate stable internal circuits because the training distribution never made them visible.

Paper workspace

Live draft structure

working-draft

Artifacts

Draft PDF

Activation-profiling companion draft. Public for reading as live manuscript copy.

Open artifact

Related split paper: script invisibility

Later split-paper render that consolidates the script-invisibility line.

Open artifact

Editable source

LaTeX source and draft PDF exist. The page should stay tied to the exact activation-profiling snapshot.

Source anchors

nko-brain-scanner/paper/current/paper1_dead_circuits.tex

nko-brain-scanner/paper/archive/paper1_dead_circuits.pdf

nko-brain-scanner/paper/final/01-script-invisibility/paper.tex

Method tags

activation profilingscript invisibilityLLM diagnostics

Ingest intersections

nkollmactivationscript-invisibilitydiagnostics

Status

Drafted; part of the flagship's companion set.

Key claims

01

Script failure can be an internal representation failure.

02

Activation profiling makes script invisibility measurable.

03

A low-resource script can reveal model blind spots hidden by benchmark averages.

Public reading note

Drafted, not yet release-ready.

Standard skeleton

What this paper must keep proving

Schema

problem

Output failure on N'Ko may reflect inactive or unstable internal circuits rather than only bad decoding.

method

Profile activation behavior when models are presented with script inputs that were structurally underrepresented in training.

implementation

Activation-probe manuscripts and N'Ko text prompts, tied to the script-invisibility paper set.

data

Controlled N'Ko script probes and model-family outputs. Public release should preserve prompt/data provenance.

evaluation

Activation differences, output behavior, and cross-checks against tokenization coverage.

references

Activation analysis, tokenizer coverage, multilingual representation learning, low-resource script benchmarks.

openQuestions

How much of the observed darkness belongs to tokenizer fragmentation versus pretraining absence.

Checkpoints and references

Proof chain

paperproven

Draft artifact exists

paper1_dead_circuits PDF and LaTeX

The paper is not just a listing entry; a rendered manuscript and source exist.

experimentpending

Cross-model structural claim

paper3_cross_model companion

The stronger structural claim belongs to the cross-model companion and should not be overclaimed here.