Back to corpus
architecturetechnical paper candidatescore 60

RAG++ Architecture Analysis & Deployment Readiness

The RAG++ system has a **solid foundation** with no glaring architectural issues. The evaluation framework revealed data/tuning needs (not architecture flaws). You can safely proceed to frontend integration and deployment.

Full HTML reader

Read the full artifact

Open in new tab

Extracted abstract or opening context

**Date**: December 2025 **System**: TrajectoryOS RAG++ v0 **Status**: Pre-Production Review The RAG++ system has a **solid foundation** with no glaring architectural issues. The evaluation framework revealed data/tuning needs (not architecture flaws). You can safely proceed to frontend integration and deployment. **Key Strengths:** - Clean service separation (5 RAG++ services + existing trajectory core) - Database schema is well-designed and extensible - Evaluation framework is comprehensive - Action classification works excellently (84.5% F1) **Key Gaps (not blockers):** - Missing REST API endpoints for RAG++ services - No frontend components for recommendations UI - Performance optimizations needed for scale **Why this is good:** - Clear separation of concerns - Each service has single responsibility - No circular dependencies - Easy to test independently

Promotion decision

What has to happen next

Promote into a technical note or architecture paper with implementation anchors.

Why this is not always a full paper yet

Corpus pages are public-safe readers for discovered workspace artifacts. They are not automatically final papers. A corpus item becomes a polished paper only after the editable source, evidence checkpoints, references, figures, render path, and release status are attached through the paper schema.