Back to corpus
architecturetechnical paper candidatescore 60
RAG++ Architecture Analysis & Deployment Readiness
The RAG++ system has a **solid foundation** with no glaring architectural issues. The evaluation framework revealed data/tuning needs (not architecture flaws). You can safely proceed to frontend integration and deployment.
Full HTML reader
Read the full artifact
Extracted abstract or opening context
**Date**: December 2025 **System**: TrajectoryOS RAG++ v0 **Status**: Pre-Production Review
The RAG++ system has a **solid foundation** with no glaring architectural issues. The evaluation framework revealed data/tuning needs (not architecture flaws). You can safely proceed to frontend integration and deployment.
**Key Strengths:** - Clean service separation (5 RAG++ services + existing trajectory core) - Database schema is well-designed and extensible - Evaluation framework is comprehensive - Action classification works excellently (84.5% F1)
**Key Gaps (not blockers):** - Missing REST API endpoints for RAG++ services - No frontend components for recommendations UI - Performance optimizations needed for scale
**Why this is good:** - Clear separation of concerns - Each service has single responsibility - No circular dependencies - Easy to test independently
Promotion decision
What has to happen next
Promote into a technical note or architecture paper with implementation anchors.
Why this is not always a full paper yet
Corpus pages are public-safe readers for discovered workspace artifacts. They are not automatically final papers. A corpus item becomes a polished paper only after the editable source, evidence checkpoints, references, figures, render path, and release status are attached through the paper schema.