Back to corpus
technical noteexperiment writeup candidatescore 34

Documentation Audit - Pass 1: Discovery & Inventory

**Date**: December 21, 2025 **Auditor**: System Analysis **Scope**: Complete cc-trajectory documentation ecosystem **Status**: Pass 1 Complete

Full HTML reader

Read the full artifact

Open in new tab

Extracted abstract or opening context

**Date**: December 21, 2025 **Auditor**: System Analysis **Scope**: Complete cc-trajectory documentation ecosystem **Status**: Pass 1 Complete **Total Documentation**: 232 markdown files - **Current Active**: 34 files (824KB in /docs) - **Legacy**: 169 files (in /legacy/cc-tpo-original) - **Service READMEs**: 1 present, 4 missing **Documentation Health**: **B-** - ✅ Strong foundational and conceptual documentation - ✅ Good planning and architecture docs - ⚠️ Weak operational and service-level docs - ❌ Missing user-facing documentation - ⚠️ Needs consolidation and cleanup (duplicates, outdated content) **Key Finding**: The documentation provides excellent coverage of vision, architecture, and implementation plans, but has accumulated technical debt through duplication, outdated references, and missing operational guides. ### 1. **"The Interview" - Undefined Core Concept** - **Status**: Referenced in multiple documents but not clearly defined - **Impact**: Critical - this appears to be a core feature/concept - **Locations**: user-guide.md, UNIFIED_TRAJECTORYOS_PLAN.md - **Action Required**: Define in dedicated document

Promotion decision

What has to happen next

Attach run IDs, datasets, metrics, and reproduction commands.

Why this is not always a full paper yet

Corpus pages are public-safe readers for discovered workspace artifacts. They are not automatically final papers. A corpus item becomes a polished paper only after the editable source, evidence checkpoints, references, figures, render path, and release status are attached through the paper schema.