Back to corpus
proposalexperiment writeup candidatescore 18
Cultural Sovereignty
Cultural sovereignty is a technical requirement: the system must preserve the specific performer, language, and practice rather than normalizing them into a generic dataset.
Full HTML reader
Read the full artifact
Extracted abstract or opening context
Cultural sovereignty is a technical requirement: the system must preserve the specific performer, language, and practice rather than normalizing them into a generic dataset.
- collect data from the actual performer and room; - preserve raw video and sensor evidence; - store source confidence and device identity; - do not collapse camera-only and mocopi-enhanced sessions into one unmarked category; - keep gesture labels tied to real detector behavior.
- preserve N'Ko Unicode and writing direction; - preserve acoustic evidence; - keep the trajectory-biased CTC anchor distinct from MAOE correction proposals; - preserve inscription provenance.
No training claim should enter the docs without the dataset, command, artifact, and evaluation report.
- treating generic motion capture as equivalent to Mohamed's performance data; - treating ASR correction as acoustic evidence; - treating sensor absence as performer absence; - treating a future shared latent as already trained; - using old implementation names as cultural theory.
Promotion decision
What has to happen next
Attach run IDs, datasets, metrics, and reproduction commands.
Why this is not always a full paper yet
Corpus pages are public-safe readers for discovered workspace artifacts. They are not automatically final papers. A corpus item becomes a polished paper only after the editable source, evidence checkpoints, references, figures, render path, and release status are attached through the paper schema.