Back to corpus
technical noteexperiment writeup candidatescore 58

cc-inscription — Full Intelligence Synthesis

cc-inscription is a Rust crate at `[home]/Desktop/Comp-Core/core/semantic/cc-inscription/` that turns a stream of "embodied dynamics" (the `z`-trajectory of latent vectors coming out of the motion brain, called DELL) into discrete, typed, hash-witnessed statements written in N'Ko script. There are exactly ten claim types — Stabilize, Disperse, Transition, Return, Dwell, Oscillate, Recover, Novel, Place-Shift, Echo — each with a locked N'Ko sigil. A `ClaimDetector` watches the trajectory; when dynamics become constr

Full HTML reader

Read the full artifact

Open in new tab

Extracted abstract or opening context

Gathered: 2026-05-11. Read-only research pass. Citations attached to every load-bearing claim. cc-inscription is a Rust crate at `[home]/Desktop/Comp-Core/core/semantic/cc-inscription/` that turns a stream of "embodied dynamics" (the `z`-trajectory of latent vectors coming out of the motion brain, called DELL) into discrete, typed, hash-witnessed statements written in N'Ko script. There are exactly ten claim types — Stabilize, Disperse, Transition, Return, Dwell, Oscillate, Recover, Novel, Place-Shift, Echo — each with a locked N'Ko sigil. A `ClaimDetector` watches the trajectory; when dynamics become constrained enough, it emits a typed Intermediate Representation (IR); a versioned `Lexicon` and `SurfaceRenderer` render that IR to a single canonical N'Ko line (`⟨sigil⟩ ⟨time⟩ : ⟨body⟩ ; ⟨slots⟩`); and a provenance layer (canonical CBOR + SHA-256 + `InscriptionId` + `ProvenanceWitness`) makes the whole thing replayable bit-for-bit. The public-facing site at `learnnko.com` calls the same 10 sigils "claims," documents the pipeline as `Motion Sensors → DELL → ClaimDetector → Claim IR → Lexicon → N'Ko Surface`, and frames the constitutional rules (replayability, determinism, non-retroactive lexicon) as a 10-document NIP series (N'Ko Improvement Proposals). The crate is fully built (10 claim types, lifecycle, lexicon, renderer, phrase mining, ontology, provenance, canonical serialization, PsiChain) but is wired into the live K11 LUMA pipeline only INDIRECTLY — `cc-brain` has its own self-contained 104D→10-claim detector (`claim_bridge.rs`) that mirrors the same sigil set, and `echelon-bar` (the K11 binary) does not link `cc-inscription` at all. The locked sigil-to-claim assignment is the single most-replicated fact across all sources. Same table appears in: - `README.md` lines 156–168 (`[home]/Desktop/Comp-Core/core/semantic/cc-inscription/README.md`) - `src/lib.rs` lines 19–31 (top crate docstring) - `docs/01-GLOSSARY.md` "The 10 Claim Types" table - `docs/02-INVARIANTS_LEDGER.md` "INV-INS-001 Sigil Immutability" - `docs/DESIGN.md` "The 10 Claim Types" - `lexicons/v1.0.json` `operator_sigils` keys - `learnnko.com/claims` (verified via WebFetch) - `LearnNKo/web/src/lib/inscription/types.ts` `CLAIM_SIGILS` - `cc-brain/src/san/claim_bridge.rs` lines 31–43 "Claim Sigil Map" | # | Name | Sigil | Unicode | What It Detects | Canonical N'Ko line | |---|------|-------|---------|-----------------|---------------------| | 1 | Stabilization | ߛ | U+07DB | Dispersion decreased measurably | `ߛ ⟦t0–t1⟧ : z(σ) ↓ ; ⟦place⟧ ; c=⟦conf⟧` | | 2 | Dispersion | ߜ | U+07DC | Spread/entropy increased | `ߜ ⟦t0–t1⟧ : z(σ) ↑ ; ⟦place⟧ ; c=⟦conf⟧` | | 3 | Transition | ߕ | U+07D5 | Discrete change point (curvature spike) | `ߕ ⟦t*⟧ : ⟦B_from⟧ → ⟦B_to⟧ ; κ=⟦sharp⟧ ; c=⟦conf⟧` | | 4

Promotion decision

What has to happen next

Attach run IDs, datasets, metrics, and reproduction commands.

Why this is not always a full paper yet

Corpus pages are public-safe readers for discovered workspace artifacts. They are not automatically final papers. A corpus item becomes a polished paper only after the editable source, evidence checkpoints, references, figures, render path, and release status are attached through the paper schema.