Grand Diomande Research · Full HTML Reader

SGT: Semantic Generative Tuning for Unified Multimodal Models

This repository hosts checkpoints fine-tuned with **Semantic Generative Tuning (SGT)** — a training paradigm that couples visual *understanding* and *generation* in Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) by using **image segmentation as a generative proxy**.

Embodied Trajectory Systems research note experiment writeup candidate score 18 .md

Full Public Reader

---
license: apache-2.0
pipeline_tag: any-to-any
library_name: bagel-mot
tags:
- sgt
- semantic-generative-tuning
- unified-multimodal
- image-segmentation
- visual-understanding
- visual-generation
---

SGT: Semantic Generative Tuning for Unified Multimodal Models

This repository hosts checkpoints fine-tuned with Semantic Generative Tuning (SGT) — a training
paradigm that couples visual understanding and generation in Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs)
by using image segmentation as a generative proxy.

> Unified multimodal models typically optimize understanding and generation with misaligned
> objectives (sparse text tokens vs. dense pixel targets), which isolates the two capabilities.
> SGT introduces segmentation — a high-level semantic task — as a unified generative objective
> that aligns the two branches, improves feature linear separability, and optimizes visual-textual
> attention allocation.

🧠 Method Overview

SGT reformulates classical visual tasks as generative proxies and establishes a hierarchical
taxonomy
(low-/mid-/high-level). Extensive experiments show that high-level semantic tasks
(e.g. image segmentation) are the optimal proxy
, outperforming depth, edge, reconstruction and
MAE/inpainting for synergizing understanding and generation.

Key findings:

1. High-level > low-level: segmentation gives larger gains in visual understanding
than depth / edge / pixel reconstruction.
2. Perception, not reasoning: visual supervision mainly strengthens perception
(spatial, hallucination, vision-centric, general VQA), rather than abstract reasoning (e.g. math, chart)
3. Architecture-agnostic: the gains hold for both BAGEL and OmniGen2.

📦 Released Artifacts

RepoTypeBase ModelContent
[`Two-hot/SGT-BAGEL`](https://huggingface.co/Two-hot/SGT-BAGEL)modelBAGEL-7B-MoTSGT fine-tuned BAGEL checkpoint
[`Two-hot/SGT-Gen2`](https://huggingface.co/Two-hot/SGT-Gen2)modelOmniGen2SGT fine-tuned OmniGen2 checkpoint (transformer/ only)
[`Two-hot/SAM-SGT`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Two-hot/SAM-SGT)datasetSegmentation training data (tar-sharded) used by SGT

Use the SAM-SGT dataset

See [`Two-hot/SAM-SGT`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Two-hot/SAM-SGT) for the data
layout and the extraction instructions.

📊 Highlights

  • **+6.02
  • Consistent improvements in spatial reasoning, hallucination resistance, vision-centric, and general VQA.
  • Generation: gains across GenEval dimensions (Position / Color etc.).
  • Verified on two representative UMM architectures (BAGEL, OmniGen2).

📝 License

Apache-2.0. Base models remain under their original licenses:
BAGEL (Apache-2.0, based on Qwen2.5-7B + SigLIP + FLUX VAE) and
OmniGen2 (based on Qwen2.5-VL + diffusion transformer).

✍️ Citation

If you find this work useful, please cite our paper:

bibtex
@article{sgt2026,
  title   = {Semantic Generative Tuning for Unified Multimodal Models},
  author  = {Songsong Yu, Yuxin Chen, Ying Shan, and Yanwei Li},
  journal = {arxiv},
  year    = {2026}
}

Promotion Decision

Attach run IDs, datasets, metrics, and reproduction commands.

Source Anchor

MotionMix/research/external/audio-ai/sgt-project-page/OmniGen2/README.md

Detected Structure

Method · Evaluation · Architecture