Grand Diomande Research · Full HTML Reader

Phase 3.3: Evaluation & Metrics - Completion Report

Phase 3.3 implements comprehensive evaluation metrics and validation tools for DLM coordinates. This phase provides the infrastructure to measure coordinate quality, validate predictions, and track training progress.

Agents That Account for Themselves experiment experiment writeup candidate score 24 .md

Full Public Reader

Phase 3.3: Evaluation & Metrics - Completion Report

Status: ✅ COMPLETE
Date: 2025-12-08
Integration Point: Week 3, Phase 3.3

---

Overview

---

Implementation Summary

Core Components Created

1. Metrics Module ([packages/dlm/evaluation/metrics.py](packages/dlm/evaluation/metrics.py)) - 450+ lines

Complete metrics implementation for coordinate quality evaluation.

Key Classes:

##### `CoordinateMetrics`
Comprehensive metrics container for coordinate quality.

python

from dlm.evaluation import CoordinateMetrics

metrics = CoordinateMetrics()
metrics.mean_absolute_error = 0.05
metrics.coordinate_coverage = 0.95
print(metrics)  # CoordinateMetrics(MAE=0.0500, RMSE=0.0000, coverage=95.00%)

Features:
- ✅ Accuracy metrics (MAE, RMSE, max error)
- ✅ Per-dimension errors (x, y, z, t)
- ✅ Consistency metrics (depth, sibling, temporal)
- ✅ Coverage metrics (coordinates, embeddings)
- ✅ Distribution statistics (ranges, means, std)
- ✅ Export to dictionary

Key Functions:

##### `calculate_coordinate_accuracy()`
Calculate prediction accuracy for coordinates.

python

from dlm.evaluation import calculate_coordinate_accuracy

predicted = [np.array([1.0, 2.0, 0.5, 0.1]), ...]
target = [np.array([1.0, 2.0, 0.5, 0.1]), ...]

accuracy = calculate_coordinate_accuracy(predicted, target)
# Returns: {
#     "mean_absolute_error": 0.05,
#     "root_mean_squared_error": 0.07,
#     "max_error": 0.15,
#     "x_error": 0.02,
#     "y_error": 0.03,
#     "z_error": 0.04,
#     "t_error": 0.05
# }

##### `calculate_coordinate_consistency()`
Validate coordinate relationships within conversation graphs.

python

from dlm.evaluation import calculate_coordinate_consistency

consistency = calculate_coordinate_consistency(graph)
# Returns: {
#     "depth_consistency": 0.95,  # Parent-child depth relationships
#     "sibling_consistency": 0.92,  # Sibling ordering
#     "temporal_consistency": 0.98  # Temporal ordering
# }

##### `calculate_coordinate_coverage()`
Measure data coverage metrics.

python

from dlm.evaluation import calculate_coordinate_coverage

coverage = calculate_coordinate_coverage(graphs)
# Returns: {
#     "coordinate_coverage": 0.87,  # % with coordinates
#     "embedding_coverage": 0.95,  # % with embeddings
#     "total_messages": 1000,
#     "messages_with_coordinates": 870,
#     "messages_with_embeddings": 950
# }

##### `compute_comprehensive_metrics()`
Compute all metrics in one call.

python

from dlm.evaluation import compute_comprehensive_metrics

metrics = compute_comprehensive_metrics(
    conversation_graphs=graphs,
    predicted_coords=predictions,  # Optional
    target_coords=targets  # Optional
)

print(f"Coverage: {metrics.coordinate_coverage:.2%}")
print(f"Accuracy: {metrics.mean_absolute_error:.4f}")
print(f"Consistency: {metrics.depth_consistency:.2f}")

---

2. Validators Module ([packages/dlm/evaluation/validators.py](packages/dlm/evaluation/validators.py)) - 350+ lines

Validation utilities for coordinate quality and relationships.

Key Classes:

##### `ValidationResult`
Container for validation results.

python

from dlm.evaluation.validators import ValidationResult

result = ValidationResult(
    is_valid=True,
    errors=[],
    warnings=["Low confidence"],
    metadata={"confidence": 0.6}
)

print(result)  # ValidationResult(✓ Valid, 0 errors, 1 warnings)

##### `CoordinateValidator`
Main validator for DLM coordinates.

python

from dlm.evaluation import CoordinateValidator

validator = CoordinateValidator(
    x_range=(0.0, 100.0),
    y_range=(0.0, 100.0),
    z_range=(0.0, 1.0),
    t_range=(0.0, 10.0),
    require_non_negative=True
)

# Validate single coordinate
result = validator.validate_coordinate(coord)
assert result.is_valid

# Validate entire graph
result = validator.validate_conversation_graph(graph)
print(f"Valid: {result.metadata['valid_coordinates']}")
print(f"Invalid: {result.metadata['invalid_coordinates']}")

Key Functions:

##### `validate_coordinate_range()`
Quick range validation for coordinates.

python

from dlm.evaluation import validate_coordinate_range

is_valid = validate_coordinate_range(
    coordinate,
    x_range=(0.0, 10.0),
    z_range=(0.0, 1.0)
)

##### `validate_coordinate_relationships()`
Validate parent-child coordinate relationships.

python

from dlm.evaluation import validate_coordinate_relationships

result = validate_coordinate_relationships(
    parent_coord,
    child_coord,
    check_depth=True,  # Parent x <= child x
    check_temporal=True  # Parent t <= child t
)

assert result.is_valid

---

Features

#### Accuracy Metrics
- Mean Absolute Error (MAE)
- Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE)
- Maximum Error
- Per-dimension errors (x, y, z, t)

#### Consistency Metrics
- Depth Consistency: Parent-child depth relationships (parent.x ≤ child.x)
- Sibling Consistency: Sibling ordering by y-coordinate
- Temporal Consistency: Message ordering by t-coordinate

#### Coverage Metrics
- Coordinate coverage (
- Embedding coverage (
- Total counts and statistics

#### Distribution Metrics
- Coordinate ranges (min/max for x, y, z, t)
- Mean values
- Standard deviations

#### Validation Features
- Range validation (coordinates within expected bounds)
- Relationship validation (parent-child consistency)
- Batch validation (validate multiple coordinates)
- Graph validation (validate entire conversation graphs)

---

Files Modified/Created

Created

File	Lines	Purpose
`packages/dlm/evaluation/__init__.py`	32	Module exports
`packages/dlm/evaluation/metrics.py`	450+	Metrics implementation
`packages/dlm/evaluation/validators.py`	350+	Validation utilities
`packages/dlm/tests/test_evaluation.py`	300+	Integration tests
`PHASE_3_3_EVALUATION.md`	This file	Documentation

### Modified
- `WEEK_3_PROGRESS_SUMMARY.md` - Updated progress to 60

---

Testing

Test Coverage: 100

7/7 tests passing:

============================================================
DLM Evaluation Module Tests
============================================================

🧪 Test: Coordinate Accuracy
  ✓ MAE: 0.0667
  ✓ RMSE: 0.0957
  ✓ Max Error: 0.2000

🧪 Test: Coordinate Validator
  ✓ Valid coordinate passed
  ✓ Invalid coordinate detected

🧪 Test: Coordinate Consistency
  ✓ Depth consistency: 1.00
  ✓ Sibling consistency: 1.00
  ✓ Temporal consistency: 1.00

🧪 Test: Coordinate Coverage
  ✓ Coordinate coverage: 50.00%
  ✓ Embedding coverage: 100.00%

🧪 Test: Validate Coordinate Range
  ✓ Range validation passed
  ✓ Out of range detected

🧪 Test: Validate Coordinate Relationships
  ✓ Valid relationship: ValidationResult(✓ Valid, 0 errors, 0 warnings)
  ✓ Invalid relationship detected: 1 errors

🧪 Test: Comprehensive Metrics
  ✓ Coverage: 100.00%
  ✓ X range: (0.0, 2.0)

============================================================
Test Results: 7 passed, 0 failed
============================================================

✅ All tests passed!

Running Tests

bash

python packages/dlm/tests/test_evaluation.py

---

Usage Examples

Example 1: Training Evaluation

python

from dlm.core import DLMDataLoader
from dlm.evaluation import compute_comprehensive_metrics

# Load training data
loader = DLMDataLoader("database.db")
graphs = [loader.load_conversation(cid) for cid in conversation_ids]

# Compute metrics
metrics = compute_comprehensive_metrics(graphs)

print(f"Coverage: {metrics.coordinate_coverage:.2%}")
print(f"Depth Consistency: {metrics.depth_consistency:.2f}")
print(f"Coordinate Range: x={metrics.x_range}, y={metrics.y_range}")

Example 2: Model Validation

python

from dlm.evaluation import calculate_coordinate_accuracy

# Get predictions from model
predicted_coords = model.predict_coordinates(embeddings)
target_coords = ground_truth_coordinates

# Calculate accuracy
accuracy = calculate_coordinate_accuracy(predicted_coords, target_coords)

print(f"MAE: {accuracy['mean_absolute_error']:.4f}")
print(f"RMSE: {accuracy['root_mean_squared_error']:.4f}")
print(f"X Error: {accuracy['x_error']:.4f}")

Example 3: Coordinate Validation

python

from dlm.evaluation import CoordinateValidator

# Create validator
validator = CoordinateValidator(
    x_range=(0.0, 50.0),
    y_range=(0.0, 50.0),
    z_range=(0.0, 1.0),
    t_range=(0.0, 5.0)
)

# Validate graph
result = validator.validate_conversation_graph(graph)

if not result.is_valid:
    print("Validation errors:")
    for error in result.errors:
        print(f"  - {error}")

print(f"Valid coordinates: {result.metadata['valid_coordinates']}")
print(f"Invalid coordinates: {result.metadata['invalid_coordinates']}")

Example 4: Consistency Checking

python

from dlm.evaluation import calculate_coordinate_consistency

# Check consistency for each conversation
for graph in conversation_graphs:
    consistency = calculate_coordinate_consistency(graph)

    if consistency['depth_consistency'] < 0.95:
        print(f"Warning: Low depth consistency in {graph.conversation_id}")

    if consistency['temporal_consistency'] < 0.95:
        print(f"Warning: Temporal ordering issues in {graph.conversation_id}")

---

Integration Benefits

### 1. Training Monitoring
- Track coordinate quality during training
- Identify issues early
- Compare model versions

### 2. Data Quality Assurance
- Validate coordinate predictions
- Ensure consistency
- Detect outliers

### 3. Model Evaluation
- Comprehensive accuracy metrics
- Per-dimension error analysis
- Relationship validation

### 4. Production Monitoring
- Real-time coordinate validation
- Coverage tracking
- Quality alerts

---

Next Steps

Phase 3.3 is complete. Ready for Phase 3.4: End-to-End Pipeline.

Phase 3.4 Prerequisites:
- ✅ Data loading (Phase 3.1)
- ✅ IRCP integration (Phase 3.2)
- ✅ Evaluation metrics (Phase 3.3)
- ⏳ Pipeline orchestration needs implementation

---

Conclusion

Phase 3.3 successfully implements comprehensive evaluation and validation infrastructure for DLM coordinates:

✅ Complete metrics system (accuracy, consistency, coverage)
✅ Robust validation tools
✅ 7/7 tests passing (100
✅ Production-ready quality monitoring
✅ Ready for Phase 3.4 integration

Status: COMPLETE ✅

**Week 3 Progress: 60

Promotion Decision

Attach run IDs, datasets, metrics, and reproduction commands.

Source Anchor

Comp-Core/backend/cc-trajectory/legacy/cc-tpo-original/cc-tpo/docs/progress/PHASE_3_3_EVALUATION.md

Detected Structure

Method · Evaluation · Code Anchors · Architecture